|
PCRE — Perl-compatible regular expressions
Just-in-time compiling is a heavyweight optimization that can greatly speed up pattern matching. However, it comes at the cost of extra processing before the match is performed. Therefore, it is of most benefit when the same pattern is going to be matched many times. This does not necessarily mean many calls of a matching function; if the pattern is not anchored, matching attempts may take place many times at various positions in the subject, even for a single call. Therefore, if the subject string is very long, it may still pay to use JIT for one-off matches.
JIT support applies only to the traditional Perl-compatible matching function. It does not apply when the DFA matching function is being used. The code for this support was written by Zoltan Herczeg.
JIT support is available for all of the 8-bit, 16-bit and
32-bit PCRE libraries. To keep this documentation simple,
only the 8-bit interface is described in what follows. If you
are using the 16-bit library, substitute the 16-bit functions
and 16-bit structures (for example, pcre16_jit_stack
instead of pcre_jit_stack
). If you are using the
32-bit library, substitute the 32-bit functions and 32-bit
structures (for example, pcre32_jit_stack
instead of pcre_jit_stack
).
JIT support is an optional feature of PCRE. The "configure" option --enable-jit (or equivalent CMake option) must be set when PCRE is built if you want to use JIT. The support is limited to the following hardware platforms:
ARM v5, v7, and Thumb2 Intel x86 32-bit and 64-bit MIPS 32-bit Power PC 32-bit and 64-bit SPARC 32-bit (experimental)
If --enable-jit is set on an unsupported platform, compilation fails.
A program that is linked with PCRE 8.20 or later can tell
if JIT support is available by calling pcre_config
() with the PCRE_CONFIG_JIT
option. The result is 1 when JIT is available, and 0
otherwise. However, a simple program does not need to check
this in order to use JIT. The normal API is implemented in a
way that falls back to the interpretive code if JIT is not
available. For programs that need the best possible
performance, there is also a "fast path" API that is
JIT-specific.
If your program may sometimes be linked with versions of PCRE that are older than 8.20, but you want to use JIT when it is available, you can test the values of PCRE_MAJOR and PCRE_MINOR, or the existence of a JIT macro such as PCRE_CONFIG_JIT, for compile-time control of your code.
You have to do two things to make use of the JIT support in the simplest way:
(1) Callpcre_study
() with the PCRE_STUDY_JIT_COMPILE option for each compiled pattern, and pass the resultingpcre_extra
block topcre_exec
().
(2) Usepcre_free_study
() to free thepcre_extra
block when it is no longer needed, instead of just freeing it yourself. This ensures that any JIT data is also freed.
For a program that may be linked with pre-8.20 versions of PCRE, you can insert
#ifndef PCRE_STUDY_JIT_COMPILE #define PCRE_STUDY_JIT_COMPILE 0 #endif
so that no option is passed to pcre_study
(), and then use something like
this to free the study data:
#ifdef PCRE_CONFIG_JIT pcre_free_study(study_ptr); #else pcre_free(study_ptr); #endif
PCRE_STUDY_JIT_COMPILE requests the JIT compiler to
generate code for complete matches. If you want to run
partial matches using the PCRE_PARTIAL_HARD or
PCRE_PARTIAL_SOFT options of pcre_exec
(), you should set one or both of
the following options in addition to, or instead of,
PCRE_STUDY_JIT_COMPILE when you call pcre_study
():
PCRE_STUDY_JIT_PARTIAL_HARD_COMPILE PCRE_STUDY_JIT_PARTIAL_SOFT_COMPILE
The JIT compiler generates different optimized code for
each of the three modes (normal, soft partial, hard partial).
When pcre_exec
() is called, the
appropriate code is run if it is available. Otherwise, the
pattern is matched using interpretive code.
In some circumstances you may need to call additional functions. These are described in the section entitled "Controlling the JIT stack" below.
If JIT support is not available, PCRE_STUDY_JIT_COMPILE
etc. are ignored, and no JIT data is created. Otherwise, the
compiled pattern is passed to the JIT compiler, which turns
it into machine code that executes much faster than the
normal interpretive code. When pcre_exec
() is passed a pcre_extra
block containing a pointer to
JIT code of the appropriate mode (normal or hard/soft
partial), it obeys that code instead of running the
interpreter. The result is identical, but the compiled JIT
code runs much faster.
There are some pcre_exec
()
options that are not supported for JIT execution. There are
also some pattern items that JIT cannot handle. Details are
given below. In both cases, execution automatically falls
back to the interpretive code. If you want to know whether
JIT was actually used for a particular match, you should
arrange for a JIT callback function to be set up as described
in the section entitled "Controlling the JIT stack" below,
even if you do not need to supply a non-default JIT stack.
Such a callback function is called whenever JIT code is about
to be obeyed. If the execution options are not right for JIT
execution, the callback function is not obeyed.
If the JIT compiler finds an unsupported item, no JIT data
is generated. You can find out if JIT execution is available
after studying a pattern by calling pcre_fullinfo
() with the PCRE_INFO_JIT
option. A result of 1 means that JIT compilation was
successful. A result of 0 means that JIT support is not
available, or the pattern was not studied with
PCRE_STUDY_JIT_COMPILE etc., or the JIT compiler was not able
to handle the pattern.
Once a pattern has been studied, with or without JIT, it can be used as many times as you like for matching different subject strings.
The only pcre_exec
() options
that are supported for JIT execution are PCRE_NO_UTF8_CHECK,
PCRE_NO_UTF16_CHECK, PCRE_NO_UTF32_CHECK, PCRE_NOTBOL,
PCRE_NOTEOL, PCRE_NOTEMPTY, PCRE_NOTEMPTY_ATSTART,
PCRE_PARTIAL_HARD, and PCRE_PARTIAL_SOFT.
The only unsupported pattern items are \C (match a single data unit) when running in a UTF mode, and a callout immediately before an assertion condition in a conditional group.
When a pattern is matched using JIT execution, the return
values are the same as those given by the interpretive
pcre_exec
() code, with the
addition of one new error code: PCRE_ERROR_JIT_STACKLIMIT.
This means that the memory used for the JIT stack was
insufficient. See "Controlling the JIT stack" below for a
discussion of JIT stack usage. For compatibility with the
interpretive pcre_exec
() code,
no more than two-thirds of the ovector
argument is used for passing back
captured substrings.
The error code PCRE_ERROR_MATCHLIMIT is returned by the JIT code if searching a very large pattern tree goes on for too long, as it is in the same circumstance when JIT is not used, but the details of exactly what is counted are not the same. The PCRE_ERROR_RECURSIONLIMIT error code is never returned by JIT execution.
The code that is generated by the JIT compiler is
architecture-specific, and is also position dependent. For
those reasons it cannot be saved (in a file or database) and
restored later like the bytecode and other data of a compiled
pattern. Saving and restoring compiled patterns is not
something many people do. More detail about this facility is
given in the pcreprecompile(3)
documentation. It should be possible to run pcre_study
() on a saved and restored
pattern, and thereby recreate the JIT data, but because JIT
compilation uses significant resources, it is probably not
worth doing this; you might as well recompile the original
pattern.
When the compiled JIT code runs, it needs a block of memory to use as a stack. By default, it uses 32K on the machine stack. However, some large or complicated patterns need more than this. The error PCRE_ERROR_JIT_STACKLIMIT is given when there is not enough stack. Three functions are provided for managing blocks of memory for use as JIT stacks. There is further discussion about the use of JIT stacks in the section entitled "JIT stack FAQ" below.
The pcre_jit_stack_alloc
()
function creates a JIT stack. Its arguments are a starting
size and a maximum size, and it returns a pointer to an
opaque structure of type pcre_jit_stack
, or NULL if there is an
error. The pcre_jit_stack_free
() function can be used
to free a stack that is no longer needed. (For the
technically minded: the address space is allocated by mmap or
VirtualAlloc.)
JIT uses far less memory for recursion than the interpretive code, and a maximum stack size of 512K to 1M should be more than enough for any pattern.
The pcre_assign_jit_stack
()
function specifies which stack JIT code should use. Its
arguments are as follows:
pcre_extra *extra pcre_jit_callback callback void *data
The extra
argument must be
the result of studying a pattern with PCRE_STUDY_JIT_COMPILE
etc. There are three cases for the values of the other two
options:
(1) Ifcallback
is NULL anddata
is NULL, an internal 32K block on the machine stack is used.
(2) Ifcallback
is NULL anddata
is not NULL,data
must be a valid JIT stack, the result of callingpcre_jit_stack_alloc
().
(3) Ifcallback
is not NULL, it must point to a function that is called withdata
as an argument at the start of matching, in order to set up a JIT stack. If the return from the callback function is NULL, the internal 32K stack is used; otherwise the return value must be a valid JIT stack, the result of callingpcre_jit_stack_alloc
().
A callback function is obeyed whenever JIT code is about
to be run; it is not obeyed when pcre_exec
() is called with options that are
incompatible for JIT execution. A callback function can
therefore be used to determine whether a match operation was
executed by JIT or by the interpreter.
You may safely use the same JIT stack for more than one pattern (either by assigning directly or by callback), as long as the patterns are all matched sequentially in the same thread. In a multithread application, if you do not specify a JIT stack, or if you assign or pass back NULL from a callback, that is thread-safe, because each thread has its own machine stack. However, if you assign or pass back a non-NULL JIT stack, this must be a different stack for each thread so that the application is thread-safe.
Strictly speaking, even more is allowed. You can assign the same non-NULL stack to any number of patterns as long as they are not used for matching by multiple threads at the same time. For example, you can assign the same stack to all compiled patterns, and use a global mutex in the callback to wait until the stack is available for use. However, this is an inefficient solution, and not recommended.
This is a suggestion for how a multithreaded program that needs to set up non-default JIT stacks might operate:
During thread initalization thread_local_var = pcre_jit_stack_alloc(...)
During thread exit pcre_jit_stack_free(thread_local_var)
Use a one-line callback function return thread_local_var
All the functions described in this section do nothing if
JIT is not available, and pcre_assign_jit_stack
() does nothing unless
the extra
argument is non-NULL
and points to a pcre_extra
block that is the result of a successful study with
PCRE_STUDY_JIT_COMPILE etc.
(1) Why do we need JIT stacks?
PCRE (and JIT) is a recursive, depth-first engine, so it needs a stack where the local data of the current node is pushed before checking its child nodes. Allocating real machine stack on some platforms is difficult. For example, the stack chain needs to be updated every time if we extend the stack on PowerPC. Although it is possible, its updating time overhead decreases performance. So we do the recursion in memory.
(2) Why don't we simply allocate blocks of memory with
malloc
()?
Modern operating systems have a nice feature: they can reserve an address space instead of allocating memory. We can safely allocate memory pages inside this address space, so the stack could grow without moving memory data (this is important because of pointers). Thus we can allocate 1M address space, and use only a single memory page (usually 4K) if that is enough. However, we can still grow up to 1M anytime if needed.
(3) Who "owns" a JIT stack?
The owner of the stack is the user program, not the JIT
studied pattern or anything else. The user program must
ensure that if a stack is used by pcre_exec
(), (that is, it is assigned to
the pattern currently running), that stack must not be used
by any other threads (to avoid overwriting the same memory
area). The best practice for multithreaded programs is to
allocate a stack for each thread, and return this stack
through the JIT callback function.
(4) When should a JIT stack be freed?
You can free a JIT stack at any time, as long as it will
not be used by pcre_exec
()
again. When you assign the stack to a pattern, only a pointer
is set. There is no reference counting or any other magic.
You can free the patterns and stacks in any order, anytime.
Just do not call
pcre_exec
() with a pattern
pointing to an already freed stack, as that will cause
SEGFAULT. (Also, do not free a stack currently used by
pcre_exec
() in another thread).
You can also replace the stack for a pattern at any time. You
can even free the previous stack before assigning a
replacement.
(5) Should I allocate/free a stack every time before/after
calling pcre_exec
()?
No, because this is too costly in terms of resources. However, you could implement some clever idea which release the stack if it is not used in let's say two minutes. The JIT callback can help to achieve this without keeping a list of the currently JIT studied patterns.
(6) OK, the stack is for long term memory allocation. But what happens if a pattern causes stack overflow with a stack of 1M? Is that 1M kept until the stack is freed?
Especially on embedded sytems, it might be a good idea to release memory sometimes without freeing the stack. There is no API for this at the moment. Probably a function call which returns with the currently allocated memory for any stack and another which allows releasing memory (shrinking the stack) would be a good idea if someone needs this.
(7) This is too much of a headache. Isn't there any better solution for JIT stack handling?
No, thanks to Windows. If POSIX threads were used everywhere, we could throw out this complicated API.
This is a single-threaded example that specifies a JIT stack without using a callback.
int rc; int ovector[30]; pcre *re; pcre_extra *extra; pcre_jit_stack *jit_stack;
re = pcre_compile(pattern, 0, &error, &erroffset, NULL); /* Check for errors */ extra = pcre_study(re, PCRE_STUDY_JIT_COMPILE, &error); jit_stack = pcre_jit_stack_alloc(32*1024, 512*1024); /* Check for error (NULL) */ pcre_assign_jit_stack(extra, NULL, jit_stack); rc = pcre_exec(re, extra, subject, length, 0, 0, ovector, 30); /* Check results */ pcre_free(re); pcre_free_study(extra); pcre_jit_stack_free(jit_stack);
Because the API described above falls back to interpreted
execution when JIT is not available, it is convenient for
programs that are written for general use in many
environments. However, calling JIT via pcre_exec
() does have a performance impact.
Programs that are written for use where JIT is known to be
available, and which need the best possible performance, can
instead use a "fast path" API to call JIT execution directly
instead of calling pcre_exec
()
(obviously only for patterns that have been successfully
studied by JIT).
The fast path function is called pcre_jit_exec
(), and it takes exactly the
same arguments as pcre_exec
(),
plus one additional argument that must point to a JIT stack.
The JIT stack arrangements described above do not apply. The
return values are the same as for pcre_exec
().
When you call pcre_exec
(),
as well as testing for invalid options, a number of other
sanity checks are performed on the arguments. For example, if
the subject pointer is NULL, or its length is negative, an
immediate error is given. Also, unless PCRE_NO_UTF[8|16|32]
is set, a UTF subject string is tested for validity. In the
interests of speed, these checks do not happen on the JIT
fast path, and if invalid data is passed, the result is
undefined.
Bypassing the sanity checks and the pcre_exec
() wrapping can give speedups of
more than 10%.
Philip Hazel (FAQ by Zoltan Herczeg) University Computing Service Cambridge CB2 3QH, England.
Last updated: 17 March 2013 Copyright (c) 1997-2013 University of Cambridge.
COPYRIGHT |
---|
This manual page is taken from the PCRE library, which is distributed under the BSD license. |