|
epoll — I/O event notification facility
#include <sys/epoll.h>
The epoll
API performs a
similar task to poll(2): monitoring
multiple file descriptors to see if I/O is possible on any of
them. The epoll
API can be
used either as an edge-triggered or a level-triggered
interface and scales well to large numbers of watched file
descriptors. The following system calls are provided to
create and manage an epoll
instance:
epoll_create(2)
creates an epoll
instance and returns a file descriptor referring to
that instance. (The more recent epoll_create1(2)
extends the functionality of epoll_create(2).)
Interest in particular file descriptors is then
registered via epoll_ctl(2). The set
of file descriptors currently registered on an
epoll
instance is
sometimes called an epoll
set.
epoll_wait(2) waits for I/O events, blocking the calling thread if no events are currently available.
The epoll
event
distribution interface is able to behave both as
edge-triggered (ET) and as level-triggered (LT). The
difference between the two mechanisms can be described as
follows. Suppose that this scenario happens:
The file descriptor that represents the read side
of a pipe (rfd
) is registered on
the epoll
instance.
A pipe writer writes 2 kB of data on the write side of the pipe.
A call to epoll_wait(2) is
done that will return rfd
as a ready file
descriptor.
The pipe reader reads 1 kB of data from rfd
.
A call to epoll_wait(2) is done.
If the rfd
file descriptor has been added to the epoll
interface using the EPOLLET
(edge-triggered) flag, the call
to epoll_wait(2) done in
step 5
will probably hang
despite the available data still present in the file input
buffer; meanwhile the remote peer might be expecting a
response based on the data it already sent. The reason for
this is that edge-triggered mode delivers events only when
changes occur on the monitored file descriptor. So, in step
5
the caller might end up
waiting for some data that is already present inside the
input buffer. In the above example, an event on rfd
will be generated
because of the write done in 2
and the event is consumed in
3
. Since the read operation
done in 4
does not consume
the whole buffer data, the call to epoll_wait(2) done in
step 5
might block
indefinitely.
An application that employs the EPOLLET
flag should use nonblocking file
descriptors to avoid having a blocking read or write starve
a task that is handling multiple file descriptors. The
suggested way to use epoll
as an edge-triggered (EPOLLET
) interface is as follows:
By contrast, when used as a level-triggered interface
(the default, when EPOLLET
is
not specified), epoll
is
simply a faster poll(2), and can be used
wherever the latter is used since it shares the same
semantics.
Since even with edge-triggered epoll
, multiple events can be generated
upon receipt of multiple chunks of data, the caller has the
option to specify the EPOLLONESHOT
flag, to tell epoll
to disable the associated file
descriptor after the receipt of an event with epoll_wait(2). When the
EPOLLONESHOT
flag is
specified, it is the caller's responsibility to rearm the
file descriptor using epoll_ctl(2) with
EPOLL_CTL_MOD
.
The following interfaces can be used to limit the amount of kernel memory consumed by epoll:
/proc/sys/fs/epoll/max_user_watches
(since Linux 2.6.28)This specifies a limit on the total number of file
descriptors that a user can register across all epoll
instances on the system. The limit is per real user
ID. Each registered file descriptor costs roughly 90
bytes on a 32-bit kernel, and roughly 160 bytes on a
64-bit kernel. Currently, the default value for
max_user_watches
is
1/25 (4%) of the available low memory, divided by the
registration cost in bytes.
While the usage of epoll
when employed as a level-triggered interface does have the
same semantics as poll(2), the
edge-triggered usage requires more clarification to avoid
stalls in the application event loop. In this example,
listener is a nonblocking socket on which listen(2) has been
called. The function do_use_fd
() uses the new ready file
descriptor until EAGAIN is
returned by either read(2) or write(2). An event-driven
state machine application should, after having received
EAGAIN, record its current
state so that at the next call to do_use_fd
() it will continue to read(2) or write(2) from where it
stopped before.
#define MAX_EVENTS 10 struct epoll_event ev, events[MAX_EVENTS]; int listen_sock, conn_sock, nfds, epollfd; /* Set up listening socket, 'listen_sock' (socket(), bind(), listen()) */ epollfd = epoll_create(10); if (epollfd == −1) { perror("epoll_create"); exit(EXIT_FAILURE); } ev.events = EPOLLIN; ev.data.fd = listen_sock; if (epoll_ctl(epollfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, listen_sock, &ev) == −1) { perror("epoll_ctl: listen_sock"); exit(EXIT_FAILURE); } for (;;) { nfds = epoll_wait(epollfd, events, MAX_EVENTS, −1); if (nfds == −1) { perror("epoll_pwait"); exit(EXIT_FAILURE); } for (n = 0; n < nfds; ++n) { if (events[n].data.fd == listen_sock) { conn_sock = accept(listen_sock, (struct sockaddr *) &local, &addrlen); if (conn_sock == −1) { perror("accept"); exit(EXIT_FAILURE); } setnonblocking(conn_sock); ev.events = EPOLLIN | EPOLLET; ev.data.fd = conn_sock; if (epoll_ctl(epollfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, conn_sock, &ev) == −1) { perror("epoll_ctl: conn_sock"); exit(EXIT_FAILURE); } } else { do_use_fd(events[n].data.fd); } } }
When used as an edge-triggered interface, for
performance reasons, it is possible to add the file
descriptor inside the epoll
interface (EPOLL_CTL_ADD
)
once by specifying (EPOLLIN
|EPOLLOUT
). This allows you to avoid
continuously switching between EPOLLIN
and EPOLLOUT
calling epoll_ctl(2) with
EPOLL_CTL_MOD
.
Q0
What is the key used to distinguish the file
descriptors registered in an epoll
set?
A0
The key is the combination of the file descriptor number and the open file description (also known as an "open file handle", the kernel's internal representation of an open file).
Q1
What happens if you register the same file
descriptor on an epoll
instance twice?
A1
You will probably get EEXIST. However, it is possible to
add a duplicate (dup(2), dup2(2), fcntl(2)
F_DUPFD
) descriptor to
the same epoll
instance. This can be a useful technique for
filtering events, if the duplicate file descriptors
are registered with different events
masks.
Q2
Can two epoll
instances wait for the same file descriptor? If so,
are events reported to both epoll
file descriptors?
A2
Yes, and events would be reported to both. However, careful programming may be needed to do this correctly.
Q3
Is the epoll
file
descriptor itself poll/epoll/selectable?
A3
Yes. If an epoll
file descriptor has events waiting then it will
indicate as being readable.
Q4
What happens if one attempts to put an
epoll
file descriptor
into its own file descriptor set?
A4
The epoll_ctl(2) call
will fail (EINVAL).
However, you can add an epoll
file descriptor inside
another epoll
file
descriptor set.
Q5
Can I send an epoll
file descriptor over a UNIX
domain socket to another process?
A5
Yes, but it does not make sense to do this, since
the receiving process would not have copies of the
file descriptors in the epoll
set.
Q6
Will closing a file descriptor cause it to be
removed from all epoll
sets automatically?
A6
Yes, but be aware of the following point. A file
descriptor is a reference to an open file description
(see open(2)). Whenever
a descriptor is duplicated via dup(2), dup2(2), fcntl(2)
F_DUPFD
, or fork(2), a new file
descriptor referring to the same open file
description is created. An open file description
continues to exist until all file descriptors
referring to it have been closed. A file descriptor
is removed from an epoll
set only after all the file
descriptors referring to the underlying open file
description have been closed (or before if the
descriptor is explicitly removed using epoll_ctl(2)
EPOLL_CTL_DEL
). This
means that even after a file descriptor that is part
of an epoll
set has
been closed, events may be reported for that file
descriptor if other file descriptors referring to the
same underlying file description remain open.
Q7
If more than one event occurs between epoll_wait(2) calls, are they combined or reported separately?
A7
They will be combined.
Q8
Does an operation on a file descriptor affect the already collected but not yet reported events?
A8
You can do two operations on an existing file descriptor. Remove would be meaningless for this case. Modify will reread available I/O.
Q9
Do I need to continuously read/write a file
descriptor until EAGAIN when using the EPOLLET
flag (edge-triggered
behavior) ?
A9
Receiving an event from epoll_wait(2) should suggest to you that such file descriptor is ready for the requested I/O operation. You must consider it ready until the next (nonblocking) read/write yields EAGAIN. When and how you will use the file descriptor is entirely up to you.
For packet/token-oriented files (e.g., datagram socket, terminal in canonical mode), the only way to detect the end of the read/write I/O space is to continue to read/write until EAGAIN.
For stream-oriented files (e.g., pipe, FIFO, stream socket), the condition that the read/write I/O space is exhausted can also be detected by checking the amount of data read from / written to the target file descriptor. For example, if you call read(2) by asking to read a certain amount of data and read(2) returns a lower number of bytes, you can be sure of having exhausted the read I/O space for the file descriptor. The same is true when writing using write(2). (Avoid this latter technique if you cannot guarantee that the monitored file descriptor always refers to a stream-oriented file.)
If there is a large amount of I/O space, it is
possible that by trying to drain it the other files
will not get processed causing starvation. (This
problem is not specific to epoll
.)
The solution is to maintain a ready list and mark the file descriptor as ready in its associated data structure, thereby allowing the application to remember which files need to be processed but still round robin amongst all the ready files. This also supports ignoring subsequent events you receive for file descriptors that are already ready.
If you use an event cache or store all the file descriptors returned from epoll_wait(2), then make sure to provide a way to mark its closure dynamically (i.e., caused by a previous event's processing). Suppose you receive 100 events from epoll_wait(2), and in event #47 a condition causes event #13 to be closed. If you remove the structure and close(2) the file descriptor for event #13, then your event cache might still say there are events waiting for that file descriptor causing confusion.
One solution for this is to call, during the processing
of event 47, epoll_ctl
(EPOLL_CTL_DEL
) to delete file descriptor
13 and close(2), then mark its
associated data structure as removed and link it to a
cleanup list. If you find another event for file descriptor
13 in your batch processing, you will discover the file
descriptor had been previously removed and there will be no
confusion.
The epoll
API was
introduced in Linux kernel 2.5.44. Support was added to glibc
in version 2.3.2.
The epoll
API is
Linux-specific. Some other systems provide similar
mechanisms, for example, FreeBSD has kqueue
, and Solaris has
/dev/poll
.
This page is part of release 3.52 of the Linux man-pages
project. A
description of the project, and information about reporting
bugs, can be found at
http://www.kernel.org/doc/man−pages/.
Copyright (C) 2003 Davide Libenzi %%%LICENSE_START(GPLv2+_SW_3_PARA) This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for more details. You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along with this manual; if not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. %%%LICENSE_END Davide Libenzi <davidelxmailserver.org> |